WhoWeAre/Talk
Ouch! The last revisions of WhoWeAre made me very sad. :(
I feel a healthy diversity (many ideas, and views) were destroyed, ideas which could be elaborated as a community approach.
Now to the newcomer, who isn't aware of the revision history, it looks, as nearly nothing had be done on this topic.
As ChangeIsCheap my good feelings are now recovering slowly :-)
Ted, could you please comment on this radical reduction. -- fridemar 15:58, 3 April 2009 (PDT)
-- fridemar 15:44, 3 April 2009 (PDT)
- Fridemar, I think I made a mistake. My intention was to document the decisions AboutUs has made as a company. I have now added a new section for the community put it its own vision, separate from that of the company. Would you like to recover the text I removed from the history to put there, or would you like me to do it? TedErnst (talk) 09:06, 5 April 2009 (PDT)
Ted, no problem. I am happy, that it was not a faked "Ted", who changed it or a Ted who muted into a
G GodKing :-) Thank you for offering the option to recover the text yourself. I'll do my best to work upon it to get the best possible resonance for the benefit of all people involved here. fridemar 07:10, 6 April 2009 (PDT)
