Difference between revisions of "LiberalsAgainstTerrorism.com"
AboutUsBot (talk | contribs) (Page Updated by AboutUsBot) |
(Culled less useful related domains (Amazon.com, Blogs.com, BlogSpot.com, Icio.us, NyTimes.com, SpreadFireFox.com, StatCounter.com, TypePad.com, WashingtonPost.com, WikiPedia.org, Yahoo.com).) |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
AlaRabiYa.net | AlaRabiYa.net | ||
AlJazeEra.net | AlJazeEra.net | ||
− | |||
AmericanFootprints.com | AmericanFootprints.com | ||
AmericanProgress.org | AmericanProgress.org | ||
Line 47: | Line 46: | ||
BlogHarbor.com | BlogHarbor.com | ||
BlogMoSis.com | BlogMoSis.com | ||
− | |||
− | |||
BlueForceBlog.com | BlueForceBlog.com | ||
Brendan-Nyhan.com | Brendan-Nyhan.com | ||
Line 106: | Line 103: | ||
House.gov | House.gov | ||
Howardwfrench.com | Howardwfrench.com | ||
− | |||
Iiss.org | Iiss.org | ||
IndianEconomy.org | IndianEconomy.org | ||
Line 128: | Line 124: | ||
NextBillion.net | NextBillion.net | ||
NyBooks.com | NyBooks.com | ||
− | |||
Nyu.edu | Nyu.edu | ||
OrinKerr.com | OrinKerr.com | ||
Line 154: | Line 149: | ||
Slate.com | Slate.com | ||
Soros.org | Soros.org | ||
− | |||
St-andrews.ac.uk | St-andrews.ac.uk | ||
− | |||
StephensonStrategies.com | StephensonStrategies.com | ||
StiftungLeoStrauss.com | StiftungLeoStrauss.com | ||
Line 177: | Line 170: | ||
Tpmmuckraker.com | Tpmmuckraker.com | ||
TrumanProject.org | TrumanProject.org | ||
− | |||
Un.org | Un.org | ||
UnDispatch.com | UnDispatch.com | ||
Line 186: | Line 178: | ||
WashingtonInstitute.org | WashingtonInstitute.org | ||
WashingtonMonthly.com | WashingtonMonthly.com | ||
− | |||
− | |||
WindsOfChange.net | WindsOfChange.net | ||
WorldBank.org | WorldBank.org | ||
WorldChanging.com | WorldChanging.com | ||
− | |||
Yale.edu | Yale.edu | ||
ZonaEuropa.com | ZonaEuropa.com | ||
Line 198: | Line 187: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
+ | |||
Revision as of 07:40, 28 September 2007
Title
american footprints - Reality-based commentary on foreign affairs
Description
I'll probably have more to say on Afghanistan later, but for now I just wanted to flag this from an Ahmed Rashid article in the New York Review of Books:
"There are, Jones writes, numerous codes of law—penal, legal, customary, and religious—that women have to conform to in each tribe or ethnic group. The question of women's rights is never raised. If they don't obey orders, or resist being abused, the men in their lives can have them arrested. As in many Muslim countries there is no specific law against rape—an Afghan woman who reports being raped is usually charged with adultery. Despite a new constitution that guarantees women's rights, many judges are barely literate and know only Sharia or Islamic law."
If as the article implies these judges think putting women in prison after being abused, raped, and burned conforms with Islamic law, then they certainlt don't know it very well, which would in any case require a great deal of education. Most of what's described in this article is actually tribal custom. Journalists often cite the need for four witnesses to a rape as an example of shari'a, but in reality that's just because some Pakistanis decided that rape should be treated as a sex crime rather than a violent crime, with the general shari'a policy toward sex crimes (such as fornication) being to discourage people from spreading gossip unless there's truly a public scandal taking place.
Additional Information
Related Domains