Difference between revisions of "FeatureMePotentials:ReadyForFeaturing"

This is a list (with multiple sub-lists) of pages that at least one community member says are ready for featuring. The more people say it's ready, the more likely it is to actually be featured. It's a kind of a never-ending election where winners are simply removed from time to time and the rest keep going. Template:clearleft

Instructions

1. Take a look at the Recently Nominated and/or Under Discussion pages. If you find one that you believe is ready to be featured, add it to the Someone says it's ready list below. Please add pages to the bottom of the list, with your name and date on the next line.
2. If you agree that a page on any of these lists is ready, please add your signature by adding a line under that entry like this:

   * ~~~~

3. If necessary, move that entry up the page above entries with fewer votes.
4. If you need help, please ContactUs or see TedErnst (talk) for help.

Pages ready for featuring

1. SuttleMusicOnline.com (1 person)
• Obed 14:10, 19 February 2008 (PST)
• TedErnst 16:46, 19 February 2008 (PST) due to lyrics question, I'm also holding off.
• The lyrics from linked songs on the wikipage may be explicit as the album has a mature (M) rating. I would urge holding off featuring this page i verify the songs. --Sa'ad ^{: msg me : email :} 02:16, 22 February 2008 (PST)

• Wow, I didn't know that! Since I do not support this kind of content, I am removing my signature. Cle Silva 06:40, 22 February 2008 (PST)

2. TazStar.com (1 person)
• Tak 14:10, 19 February 2008 (PST)

Discussion leading to the creation of this page

We have always wanted decisions about which pages are ready to feature to be a public decision, made by the community. We could make a list of pages that anyone believes are ready. Anyone may add a new page to the bottom of that list. Anyone may add their name to any page on the list. The list is ordered by number of names saying it's ready by most names to least, and we feature from the top.

Comments:

That looks like the poll I was suggesting before. -- Cle

Yes, definitely, this is like the poll you were suggesting. I think the poll is a great idea. And if it can be more fluid (we only have to have a winner at the moment when a new feature is put up, and previous yes votes carry forward, and everyone can vote for as many as they like), then I think it really works in the wiki. TedErnst (talk)